§

Aqua-Aston Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel and Hotel Renew

367 NLRB No. 27 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Aqua-Aston Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel and Hotel Renew

11 Cited authorities

  1. Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

    522 U.S. 948 (1997)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  5. Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

    346 U.S. 482 (1953)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

  6. Big Ridge, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when it vacated a Board decision without remand because the Board lacked a proper quorum, it had “expected the Board to consider the case anew once it regained a quorum”

  7. New Breed Leasing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    111 F.3d 1460 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”

  8. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  9. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  10. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.3d 972 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 97-1417, 97-1418 Argued April 9, 1998 Decided June 26, 1998 On Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of Orders of the National Labor Relations Board Vincent J. Apruzzese argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel. Margaret A. Gaines, Supervisory