§

Applebaum Industries, Inc., Michael'S Closet, Inc., Gloria Manufacturing Corp.

294 N.L.R.B. 981 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Applebaum Industries, Inc., Michael'S Closet, Inc., Gloria Manufacturing Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bildisco & Bildisco

    465 U.S. 513 (1984)   Cited 1,161 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure of Congress to draft an exclusion for certain collective bargaining agreements in 11 U.S.C. § 365 indicates that the provision applies to all such agreements, in light of the previous use of such an exclusion by Congress in 11 U.S.C. § 1167

  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times

    No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Great Western Coca-Cola Bottling

    740 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that a supervisor's statement to employee that he knew employee's co-workers were union members created impression that company was engaged in surveillance, exacerbated the coercive effect of the interrogation, and constituted an independent violation of § 8

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 46

    727 F.2d 234 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 5 times

    Cal. No. 151, Docket 83-4045. Argued September 19, 1983. Decided January 31, 1984. Charles P. Donnelly, Washington, D.C. (William Wachter, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Assoc. Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Wash., D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert C. Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa. (Markowitz Richman, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for respondent Local Union No. 46, Metallic Lathers and Reinforcing Iron