§

Apple SoCal, LLC d/b/a Applebee's, Apple American Group II, LLC d/b/a Applebee's, and Apple American

367 NLRB No. 44 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Apple SoCal, LLC d/b/a Applebee's, Apple American Group II, LLC d/b/a Applebee's, and Apple American

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan

    536 U.S. 101 (2002)   Cited 10,618 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding limitations period for hostile-work-environment claim runs from the last act composing the claim

  2. EPIC Sys. Corp. v. Lewis

    138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)   Cited 975 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Concepcion , "courts may not allow a contract defense to reshape traditional individualized arbitration" and "a rule seeking to declare individualized arbitration proceedings off limits" is preempted by the FAA

  3. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

    550 U.S. 618 (2007)   Cited 537 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute of limitations barred suit for wage discrimination despite difficulty in discovering such discrimination

  4. Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

    834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 147 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause

  5. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 142 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  6. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act

  7. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA