Apple Inc. v. Virnetx, Inc. and Science Application International Corporation

6 Cited authorities

  1. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft v. Quigg

    917 F.2d 522 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 7 times
    Stating that "[w]hen faced with [statutory] ambiguity it is incumbent upon this court to examine the legislative history to discern Congress' intent"
  2. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 550 times   897 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent
  3. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 408 times   201 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding
  4. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 377 times   633 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"
  5. Section 42.107 - Preliminary response to petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.107   Cited 95 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Requiring initiation of IPR within six months of filing and a decision within twelve months thereafter
  6. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 46 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution