4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bailey Co.
180 F.2d 278 (6th Cir. 1950) Cited 23 timesNo. 10883. February 13, 1950. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Albert Gore, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Welles K. Stanley, Eugene B. Schwartz, Carl H. Clark, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief; Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod
109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940) Cited 28 timesIn N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Harris-Woodson Co.
162 F.2d 97 (4th Cir. 1947) Cited 18 timesNo. 5585. May 31, 1947. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce a cease and desist order against Harris-Woodson Company., Inc. Order enforced. Sidney J. Barban, of Baltimore, Md. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Morris P. Glushien, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Bernard Dunau, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Karl M. Dollak, of Washington, D.C., (William F. Howe and Gall Lane, all of Washington
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kingston
172 F.2d 771 (6th Cir. 1949) Cited 7 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Kingston, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 771, the court emphasized that there was not present a background of anti-union conduct.