Antioch Rock & Ready Mix

9 Cited authorities

  1. Solitron Devices v. Island Territory of Curacao

    416 U.S. 986 (1974)   Cited 131 times
    Granting enforcement
  2. Kux Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 20 times
    Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hood Furniture Mfg. Co.

    941 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming Board's finding that third-party conduct did not justify setting aside election results even when terminated employees told former coworkers waiting in line to vote that they "kn[e]w damn well the way" they were "supposed to vote"
  4. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene
  5. Harlan #4 Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1997. Argued June 9, 1973. Decided January 10, 1974. John E. Jenkins, Jr., Jenkins, Schaub Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief for petitioner. Fredric Sagan, N.L.R.B. for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges. McCREE

  6. Valley Rock Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    590 F.2d 300 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 14 times

    No. 77-3854. January 25, 1979. J. Mark Montobbio (argued), Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Andrew Tranovich (argued), Washington, D.C., for respondents. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWNING and HUG, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, District Judge. Honorable Walter E. Hoffman, Senior United States District Judge, Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court upon the

  7. ITT Lighting Fixtures v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    658 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In ITT Lighting Fixtures, the court, in denying enforcement of the Board's order, held that "the criteria developed by the Board for determining whether a supervisor [is] `major' or `minor,' and whether the exercise of a supervisor's authority could have an impact on the laboratory condition for voting," cannot be made "simply by labeling a supervisor as `minor'; instead there must be consideration of both the extent of the supervisor's authority and the extent of his pro-union activity."
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Sons, Inc.

    597 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 9 times

    No. 77-1775. January 22, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1979. Richard Brooks (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Michael B. Roger (argued) of Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for Butchers Union Local 193. Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MERRILL and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge. Honorable John R. Bartels, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

    470 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times
    Refusing to presume that the unlawful activity had an impact on or interference with the employees' freedom of choice where the record showed that the effect of the conduct was limited to specific employees, each of whom testified that he had voted his conscience and had ignored the unlawful conduct