§

Anne C.,1 Complainant, v. Julian Castro, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

0720160017 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 9, 2016)
Anne C.,1 Complainant, v. Julian Castro, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,692 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. Blum v. Stenson

    465 U.S. 886 (1984)   Cited 8,879 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting is “to be calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community, regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by private or nonprofit counsel”

  3. Luciano v. Olsten Corporation

    109 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 526 times
    Holding that the district court, in setting fees, appropriately relied upon prevailing market rates in the Eastern District of New York where the case was commenced and litigated

  4. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense

    675 F.2d 1319 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 524 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a fee application must "contain sufficiently detailed information about the hours logged and the work done"

  5. Coutin v. Young Rubicam Puerto Rico, Inc.

    124 F.3d 331 (1st Cir. 1997)   Cited 221 times
    Finding an award of over $45,000 substantial, especially in view of the fact that it represented three times the plaintiff's yearly salary

  6. Clanton v. Allied Chemical Corp.

    416 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. Va. 1976)   Cited 12 times

    Civ. A. No. 5-73-R. June 23, 1976. Henry L. Marsh, III, James W. Benton, Jr., Hill, Tucker Marsh, Richmond, Va., Robert B. Wallace, Alexandria, Va., Charles Lister, David J. Cynamon, Covington Burling, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Francis V. Lowden, Jr., Hill B. Wellford, Jr., Jack W. Burtch, Jr., Hunton Williams, Richmond, Va., for defendant. MEMORANDUM MERHIGE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court once again for a determination of the issue of counsel fees, if any, to be assessed

  7. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,956 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"