§

Anna Telford, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

01973892 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 2, 1999)
Anna Telford, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

12 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,419 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,286 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 20,004 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

  4. U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens

    460 U.S. 711 (1983)   Cited 2,406 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination

  5. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,404 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption

  6. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    567 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that under Title VII class action, single-filing cannot revive claims that are no longer viable at the time of filing

  7. Fallon v. Illinois

    882 F.2d 1206 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 173 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the EPA and Title VII are distinct remedies

  8. Horner v. Mary Institute

    613 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the differential in salary between plaintiff and her comparator was the result of negotiations, which is sufficient to rebut plaintiff's prima facie case of pay discrimination

  9. Angelo v. Bacharach Instrument Co.

    555 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that it was within the discretion of the trial judge to exclude an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) determination letter because the probative value of the letter “was substantially outweighed by the dangers of unfair prejudice and misleading the jury inherent in an...EEOC evaluation of the ultimate factual issue in the case.”

  10. Goodrich v. Intern. Broth. of Elec. Wkrs

    815 F.2d 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 23 times

    No. 86-5060. Argued January 27, 1987. Decided April 3, 1987. Richard J. Hirn, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Terry R. Yellig, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 81-03214). Before WALD, Chief Judge, STARR and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291(a). Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD. WALD, Chief

  11. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,688 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions