§

Anita A. Wulf, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

01a01481 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 2, 2000)
Anita A. Wulf, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,615 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kan., Inc.

    683 F.2d 339 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 401 times
    Holding that three years between the protected activity and the adverse employment action was too long to establish the third element