§

Andrew Sheppard, Complainant, v. Ida L. Castro, Chairwoman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Agency.

01a02919 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 21, 2000)
Andrew Sheppard, Complainant, v. Ida L. Castro, Chairwoman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,404 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption

  2. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    567 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that under Title VII class action, single-filing cannot revive claims that are no longer viable at the time of filing

  3. Fallon v. Illinois

    882 F.2d 1206 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 173 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the EPA and Title VII are distinct remedies

  4. Horner v. Mary Institute

    613 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the differential in salary between plaintiff and her comparator was the result of negotiations, which is sufficient to rebut plaintiff's prima facie case of pay discrimination

  5. Angelo v. Bacharach Instrument Co.

    555 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that it was within the discretion of the trial judge to exclude an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) determination letter because the probative value of the letter “was substantially outweighed by the dangers of unfair prejudice and misleading the jury inherent in an...EEOC evaluation of the ultimate factual issue in the case.”

  6. Goodrich v. Intern. Broth. of Elec. Wkrs

    815 F.2d 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 23 times

    No. 86-5060. Argued January 27, 1987. Decided April 3, 1987. Richard J. Hirn, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Terry R. Yellig, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 81-03214). Before WALD, Chief Judge, STARR and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291(a). Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD. WALD, Chief