Andrew Jergens Co. of California

6 Cited authorities

Nardone v. United States
308 U.S. 338 (1939) Cited 1,593 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search
Burdeau v. McDowell
256 U.S. 465 (1921) Cited 993 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that when "no official of the federal government had anything to do with the wrongful seizure of the petitioner's property, . . . there was no invasion of the security afforded by the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure, as whatever wrong was done was the act of individuals in taking the property of another"
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 318 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
Nardone v. United States
302 U.S. 379 (1937) Cited 274 times
Holding that where telephone message was intercepted in violation of Federal Communications Act the "plain words" of the statute prohibited "recit[ation] [of] the contents of the message in testimony before a court"
Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines
303 U.S. 261 (1938) Cited 264 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
Labor Board v. Falk Corp.
308 U.S. 453 (1940) Cited 140 times
In Falk, the two proceedings were held simultaneously, whereas in our case the representation case preceded the unfair labor case.

Andrew Jergens Co. of California

6 Cited authorities

Nardone v. United States

Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search

Burdeau v. McDowell

Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

Nardone v. United States

Holding that where telephone message was intercepted in violation of Federal Communications Act the "plain words" of the statute prohibited "recit[ation] [of] the contents of the message in testimony before a court"

Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

Labor Board v. Falk Corp.

In Falk, the two proceedings were held simultaneously, whereas in our case the representation case preceded the unfair labor case.