§

Anchor Rome Mills, Inc.

86 N.L.R.B. 1120 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
Anchor Rome Mills, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Matter of Inland Steel Co., (N.D.Ind. 1980)

    492 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ind. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    In Inland Steel, the district judge examined the structure and legislative history of section 8 of the Act and concluded that Congress did not intend to grant the Secretary of Labor the authority to inspect documents pursuant to a warrant.