Ampersand Publishing, LLC d/b/a Santa Barbara News-Press

8 Cited authorities

Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal Analyses
Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
WM Properties of Ct. v. N. L. R. Bd.
514 F.3d 1341 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Cited 27 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board finding that an employer failed to satisfy its Wright Line rebuttal burden when it deviated from its alleged "neutral and objective hiring criteria," thereby rendering those criteria "illusory"
Stephens Media, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
677 F.3d 1241 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Cited 17 times
Applying the Bennett standard to cross-petitions for enforcement and review under Section 10(e) and 10(f)
Evans v. Stephens
387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 15 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
Ampersand Publishing, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
702 F.3d 51 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Cited 6 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding that where enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act would interfere with a newspaper's editorial discretion, "the statute must yield"
United States v. Woodley
751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 14 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view
United States v. Allocco
305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,061 times 23 Legal Analyses
Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

Ampersand Publishing, LLC d/b/a Santa Barbara News-Press

8 Cited authorities

Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

Affirming Board finding that an employer failed to satisfy its Wright Line rebuttal burden when it deviated from its alleged "neutral and objective hiring criteria," thereby rendering those criteria "illusory"

Applying the Bennett standard to cross-petitions for enforcement and review under Section 10(e) and 10(f)

Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment

Finding that where enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act would interfere with a newspaper's editorial discretion, "the statute must yield"

Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view

Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess

Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB