§
AMP, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged

  2. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 40 times
    In Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970), which the Board cites, the Fifth Circuit focussed on the context of the misconduct as the key to deciding whether the misconduct was protected by the Act.

  3. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins.

    167 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Supporting employees' entitlement to write a letter complaining about supervisor

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Comfort, Inc.

    365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times

    No. 18210. September 13, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 11, 1966. Richard S. Rodin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington D.C., were with him on the brief. Bailey C. Webber, Ottumwa, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges. MATTHES

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Miami

    449 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 449 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 2434, 32 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972), the court found that the employer violated the Act by discharging employees who ceased working, went to the plant manager to protest the discharge of six other employees, and upon the plant manager's refusal to reinstate the six, sat down and refused either to return to work or to leave the plant.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hanes Hosiery Div., Hanes Corp.

    413 F.2d 457 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 12 times

    No. 12981. Argued May 8, 1969. Decided July 18, 1969. Susan Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William Wachter, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. W.S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Douglas P. Murray and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. BUTZNER, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hilton Mobile Homes

    387 F.2d 7 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. Hilton Mobile Homes, 387 F.2d 7 (8 Cir. 1967), the employer offered a discharged employee reinstatement, but without seniority rights.

  9. Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    179 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12798. January 30, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1950. Conrad Meyer, III, New Orleans, La., Lawrence A. Molony, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. I.J. Gromfine, Attorney, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. While the order sought to be enforced contains provisions ordering the respondent to cease