§

Amglo Kemlite Laboratories

13-CA-065271 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 22, 2012)
Amglo Kemlite Laboratories

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Service Emp. Int. v. Nati. Labor Relations

    647 F.3d 435 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 33 times

    Docket No. 10–3616–ag. 2011-08-1 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Andrew L. Strom, Office of the General Counsel, SEIU Local 32BJ, New York, NY, for Petitioner.Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel (Robert Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, on the brief),

  4. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  5. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  6. Molon Motor & Coil Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    965 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 91-1885, 91-2222. Argued January 9, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. As Amended July 15, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 27, 1992. John C. Truesdale, Paul J. Spielberg (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Steven L. Gillman (argued), Davi L. Hirsch, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., for Molon Motor Coil Corp. Susan