§

AMF Trucking & Warehousing

342 N.L.R.B. 1125 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
AMF Trucking & Warehousing

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.3d 955 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 21 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board's "clipped view of the record" did not support its finding that the employer had committed unfair labor practices

  3. Stroehmann Bakeries v. Nat'l Labor Relations

    95 F.3d 218 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1429, 1887; Nos. 95-4159(L), 95-4207(XAP). Argued May 20, 1996. Decided September 9, 1996. Steven R. Wall, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Philadelphia, PA (Edward S. Mazurek, of counsel), for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. David A. Fleischer, Staff Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, of counsel), for Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. Cross-petitions for

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Celotex Corporation

    364 F.2d 552 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 13 times
    In Celotex, for example, the court enforced a Board order finding that an employer had pleaded inability to pay when it insisted that concessions were necessary to make its "plant competitive and to insure that plant's survival," 364 F.2d at 553 (emphasis added), and not solely on the basis of a claim of competitive disadvantage. Indeed, the trial examiner found that the bargaining between the parties had taken place in the context of what wage rate the plant " could afford."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Taylor

    338 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times

    No. 21074. November 30, 1964. Duane R. Batista, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Keith Nelson, Otis E. Nelson, Nelson, Montgomery Robertson, Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondent. Before BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and ESTES, District Judge. PER CURIAM: In this proceeding to enforce the Board's order finding the Employer guilty of