American Wire Products

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.
201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 96 times
Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"
Ballou Brick Co. v. N.L.R.B
798 F.2d 339 (8th Cir. 1986) Cited 14 times
Modifying statement sufficient to render an otherwise invalid statement valid was made two weeks before the start of the union campaign, was announced in affirmative terms, and there was "no evidence that the employees did not know of the rule change"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG
213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954) Cited 14 times
No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

American Wire Products

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

Ballou Brick Co. v. N.L.R.B

Modifying statement sufficient to render an otherwise invalid statement valid was made two weeks before the start of the union campaign, was announced in affirmative terms, and there was "no evidence that the employees did not know of the rule change"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG

Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions