§

American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

231 N.L.R.B. 556 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills

    353 U.S. 448 (1957)   Cited 2,323 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

  2. Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co.

    369 U.S. 95 (1962)   Cited 1,181 times
    Holding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  5. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA

  6. Title Guarantee Co. v. N.L.R.B

    534 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 60 times
    Holding statements of employees and union representatives obtained in NLRB investigation exempt from disclosure under Exemption 7 until completion of administrative and judicial proceedings

  7. Kellogg Company v. N.L.R.B

    457 F.2d 519 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 33 times
    In Kellogg Co. v. NLRB, 457 F.2d 519, 525 (6th Cir. 1972), we stated that the employees' right to honor another's picketline may only be waived through "clear and unmistakable language."

  8. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. N.L.R.B

    539 F.2d 63 (10th Cir. 1976)   Cited 18 times
    In Climax Molybdenum Co. v. NLRB, 539 F.2d 63 (10th Cir. 1976), we concluded that disclosure of the material described in that case would interfere with the enforcement proceedings before the Board.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Greyhound Lines

    426 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 27429. April 20, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before GOLDBERG, DYER and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of an order issued against Southern Greyhound Lines, Inc. Our basic problem revolves around the discharge of a conscientious

  10. Newspaper Production Company v. N.L.R.B

    503 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    Allowing employees to bargain to impasse on restriction of bargaining unit where issue was whether there should be one union or two

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,414 times   559 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  12. Section 654 - Duties of employers and employees

    29 U.S.C. § 654   Cited 611 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to "comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this chapter"