All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
American Reclamation, Inc.
31-CA-067258 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 17, 2012)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
Citing Briefs
Briefs
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
5
American Reclamation, Inc.
5
Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969)
Cited 1,036 times
71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith
487 U.S. 1205 (1988)
Cited 106 times
6 Legal Analyses
Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)
Cited 358 times
46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B
647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)
Cited 6 times
Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning
Prill v. N.L.R.B
835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Cited 27 times
8 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”