§

American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

155 N.L.R.B. 736 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. United States v. Ryan

    350 U.S. 299 (1956)   Cited 119 times
    Interpreting an earlier version of § 186 as "a criminal provision, malum prohibitum, which outlaws all payments, with stated exceptions, between employer and representative"

  3. Standard Oil Company v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Standard Oil Co. v. NLRB, 322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963), four oil refineries of the same company constituted separate bargaining units; one was represented by an international union and the other three by locals thereof.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Am. Compress Ware

    350 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 21365. July 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1965. Herman M. Levy, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joe P. Mathews, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions the Court for enforcement of its order which found that the Respondent Company violated section

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper

    213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest