American Petrofina Co., Texas

20 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.
309 U.S. 206 (1940) Cited 219 times
Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium
436 F.2d 45 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 39 times
In NLRB v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium, supra, 436 F.2d at 50, we said that the "test is whether the business reason or the... union activity is the moving cause behind the discharge.
N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company
405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 40 times
Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits
N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc.
374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 34 times
Finding inference that supervisor who walked past a sign every day saw that sign was reasonable and provided substantial evidence for the NLRB's decision
Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 25 times
No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferguson
257 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1958) Cited 38 times
No. 16973. June 30, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Ralph W. Malone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is a Petition by the Board for enforcement of an Order, 118 N.L.R.B. No. 30, finding the Employer, Shovel Supply Company, guilty of 8(a)(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), violations and requiring the reinstatement of four
United Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B
440 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1971) Cited 21 times
Holding that because the prevailing party could have sought review of an adverse determination through cross-appeal, "the general rule that `determinations adverse to the winning litigant do not have conclusive effect as collateral estoppel' should not be applied."
N.L.R.B. v. Apico Inns of California, Inc.
512 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir. 1975) Cited 14 times
In Apico, the employee denied reinstatement had forced another employee to quit due to his sexual advances, had been drunk on the job, had made profane and derogatory remarks about management in the presence of customers, and had solicited a fellow employee to engage in prostitution.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Coast Casket Co.
205 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 37 times
No. 13515. June 30, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Coun., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Coun., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Coun., Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James S. Duberg and Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, petitions for enforcement of an order
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors
196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 37 times
No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

American Petrofina Co., Texas

20 Cited authorities

Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

In NLRB v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium, supra, 436 F.2d at 50, we said that the "test is whether the business reason or the... union activity is the moving cause behind the discharge.

Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

Finding inference that supervisor who walked past a sign every day saw that sign was reasonable and provided substantial evidence for the NLRB's decision

Holding that because the prevailing party could have sought review of an adverse determination through cross-appeal, "the general rule that `determinations adverse to the winning litigant do not have conclusive effect as collateral estoppel' should not be applied."

In Apico, the employee denied reinstatement had forced another employee to quit due to his sexual advances, had been drunk on the job, had made profane and derogatory remarks about management in the presence of customers, and had solicited a fellow employee to engage in prostitution.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"