§

American Paper & Supply Co.

159 N.L.R.B. 1243 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
American Paper & Supply Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 684 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times

    No. 121, Docket 29793. Argued November 3, 1965. Decided January 14, 1966. Harold B. Shore, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel K. Levene, Binghamton, N.Y. (David Levene, Levene, Gouldin Thompson, Binghamton, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Rural Electric Company

    296 F.2d 523 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6715. October 28, 1961. Glen Bendixsen, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel, and Julius G. Getman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Warren L. Tomlinson, Denver, Colo. (Loomis, Lazear Wilson, James O. Wilson, Cheyenne, Wyo., Holland Hart, and John Carroll Richardson, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, PICKETT, and HILL, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. This proceeding tests the validity

  6. N.L.R.B. v. F.M. Reeves and Sons, Inc.

    273 F.2d 710 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6125. December 17, 1959. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Arthur C. Katims, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Scott Toothaker, McAllen, Tex. (Ewers, Toothaker, Ewers, Elick, Jones Abbott, McAllen, Tex., of counsel), for respondent. Before BRATTON, PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding