§

American Medical Response Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

05-CA-221233 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 29, 2021)
American Medical Response Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    988 F.3d 487 (D.C. Cir. 2021)   Cited 3 times

    No. 20-1060 C/w 20-1061, 20-1134 02-19-2021 LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Intervenor A. John Harper III argued the cause for petitioner Leggett & Platt, Inc. With him on the briefs were Arthur T. Carter and Arrissa K. Meyer. Aaron B. Solem argued the cause for petitioner Keith Purvis. With him on the brief was Glenn M. Taubman. Barbara A. Sheehy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board