3 Cited authorities
Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 781 (1996) Cited 59 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"
JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
360 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2004) Cited 10 timesNo. 03-2303. Submitted: November 17, 2003. Filed: March 16, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence P. Kaplan, argued, St. Louis, MO (Joshua M. Avigad, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant. Jeffrey L. Horowitz, argued, of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. (Charles Donnelly of the NLRB, Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief), for appellee. James I. Singer, argued, St. Louis, MO, intervenor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No
Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B
939 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1991) Cited 4 timesNos. 90-6340, 90-6539. Argued July 18, 1991. Decided August 5, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 18, 1991. Keith A. Ashmus (argued), Carl H. Gluek, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner, cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., John C. Truesdale, Executive Secretary, Margaret E. Luke (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent