American Mailers (Plant #2)

22 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  4. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  6. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Newspapers, Inc.

    515 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 20 times

    No. 74-3004. June 27, 1975. Rehearing Denied August 29, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John F. Depenbrock, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Reg. Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for petitioner. Robert L. Ballow, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before TUTTLE, GODBOLD and MORGAN, Circuit Judges: TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Jacobs Mfg. Co.

    196 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Labor Board v. Jacobs Mfg. Co., 196 F.2d 680, the Second Circuit upheld a Board finding of bad-faith bargaining based on an employer's refusal to supply financial information under circumstances similar to those here. Because of the conflict and the importance of the question we granted certiorari. 350 U.S. 922.
  10. Local 57, Int. L. Garment W. U. v. N.L.R.B

    374 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 19478, 19624. Argued February 11, 1966. Decided January 11, 1967. Certiorari Denied June 5, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 2074, 2078. Mr. Max Zimny, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19478. Messrs. John A. McGuinn, Washington, D.C., and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, Fla., with whom Mr. Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"