§

American Linen Supply Co.

297 N.L.R.B. 137 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
American Linen Supply Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  4. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Carilli

    648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    In NLRB v. Carilli, 648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981), an employer cited § 186(c)(5)(B) in attacking the NLRB's finding that it violated Section 8(a)(5) of the NLRA by discontinuing payments to a trust fund.

  6. Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    632 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 38 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining" under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act

  7. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mars Sales Equipment Co.

    626 F.2d 567 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 21 times

    No. 79-2082. Argued April 29, 1980. Decided July 21, 1980. Penny Pilzer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph A. Yocum, Yocum Hahn, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before WOOD, Circuit Judge, MARKEY, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Chief Judge Howard T. Markey of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals is sitting by designation. HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a National Labor Relations Board application for enforcement of its order

  9. Hotel, Motel Restaurant Employees v. N.L.R.B

    785 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times

    No. 85-7106. Argued and Submitted November 13, 1985. Decided March 25, 1986. David Rosenfeld, William A. Sokol. Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. William Stewart, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Susan Ardissan, M. Armon Cooper, Lukens, St. Peter Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor-respondent. Burger Pits, Inc. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED, KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    613 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that invitations to employees to disclose their union activities and sympathies constitute interrogation