American Homes Systems

Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
First National Bank of Omaha v. N.L.R.B
413 F.2d 921 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 20 times
No. 19356. July 22, 1969. Rehearing Denied August 26, 1969. Clifton L. Elliott and Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner, William E. Morrow, Jr., Omaha, Neb., was on the brief with Clifton L. Elliott, and Harry L. Browne. Robert E. Williams, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.
251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"
N.L.R.B. v. Fruin-Colnon Construction Co.
330 F.2d 885 (8th Cir. 1964) Cited 12 times
Rejecting § 502 applicability when evidence of abnormal danger was "based upon isolated testimony of the alleged discriminatees and unreasonable inferences which are unsubstantial considering the record as a whole"