American Freightways Co., Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Steelworkers
357 U.S. 357 (1958) Cited 72 timesIn United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works
153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946) Cited 47 timesNoting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Avondale Mills
242 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 13 timesNo. 16243. March 29, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1957. Franklin C. Milliken, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, M.A. Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., Mildred McClelland, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations