9 Cited authorities
Mine Workers v. Pennington
381 U.S. 657 (1965) Cited 1,650 times 21 Legal AnalysesHolding that immunity extends to petitioning conduct “either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme”
Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 timesNos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty
Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B
328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 timesNo. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board
Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 44 timesSubcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible
Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964) Cited 32 timesGiving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice
Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 26 timesNos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel
Minnesota Milk Company v. N.L.R.B
314 F.2d 761 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 7 timesNo. 16966. March 7, 1963. Thomas M. Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., made argument for petitioner; Felhaber, Larson Fenlon, St. Paul, Minn., with him on the brief. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent; Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief. Donald Savelkoul, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for intervenor and
Meat Hwy. Drivers, Etc., U. L. v. N.L.R.B
348 F.2d 803 (D.C. Cir. 1965)No. 18091. Filed July 6, 1965. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, in Chambers. PER CURIAM: On September 11, 1964, this court decreed that "the Board's order, * * * insofar as it pertains to the work standards clause, is remanded to the Board for decision in the light of the Court's opinion." Instead of deciding the work standards clause issue on the record already made, the Board, on December 3, 1964, issued an order reopening the record and remanding the proceeding
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,104 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"