American Federation of Musicians

8 Cited authorities

Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.
303 U.S. 41 (1938) Cited 1,426 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 334 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Machinists v. Gonzales
356 U.S. 617 (1958) Cited 256 times
Holding that state contract claim was not preempted because it was internal to the union and not subject to regulation under the NLRA
Walling v. Helmerich Payne
323 U.S. 37 (1944) Cited 301 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding controversy remained where defendant "ha[d] consistently urged the validity of the [practice] and would presumably be free to resume [it] were not some effective restraint made"
Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.
365 U.S. 695 (1961) Cited 22 times
In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.
American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B
193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 38 times
In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.
Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 34 times
In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.
Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
358 F.2d 656 (7th Cir. 1966) Cited 8 times
No. 14853. March 11, 1966. John L. Waddleton, Howard C. Equitz, Maxwell H. Herriott, and James Urdan, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Norton J. Come, Assts. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Washington, D.C., Stephen I. Schlossberg, Detroit, Mich., Philip L. Padden, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Harold A. Katz, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG, KNOCH, CASTLE, KILEY

American Federation of Musicians

8 Cited authorities

Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Holding that state contract claim was not preempted because it was internal to the union and not subject to regulation under the NLRA

Holding controversy remained where defendant "ha[d] consistently urged the validity of the [practice] and would presumably be free to resume [it] were not some effective restraint made"

In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.