§

American & Efird Mills

269 N.L.R.B. 1077 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
American & Efird Mills

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  3. Air Surrey Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times
    Vacating the Board's order because substantial evidence did not show that the employee's supervisor knew of his protected activity

  4. N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc.

    486 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc., supra, 486 F.2d 977, 978, the court recognized the "emergence of [the Interboro] rule" but found it unnecessary to follow.

  5. Section 392.3 - Ill or fatigued operator

    49 C.F.R. § 392.3   Cited 81 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that motor carrier may not require a driver to operate a commercial vehicle “while the driver's ability or alertness is so impaired, or so likely to become impaired, through fatigue, illness or any other cause , as to make it unsafe for him/her to begin or continue to operate the commercial motor vehicle”