American Can Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
  2. Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers U. v. N.L.R.B

    463 F.2d 907 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 61 times
    In Ladies' Garment Workers, the Second Circuit stated that "no genuine bargaining... can be conducted where the decision has already been made and implemented."
  3. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.
  4. Fraser Johnston Company v. N.L.R.B

    469 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times
    In Fraser Johnston Co. v. NLRB, 469 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1972), the Board found that the employer violated § 8(a)(2) by improperly recognizing a union as the bargaining representative at a time when the bargaining unit did not represent a substantial employee complement.
  5. Cooper Thermometer Company v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 684 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming a Board finding of an unfair labor practice where employer did not provide employees with information about how they could transfer to a new plant after operations at an initial plant were terminated
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Die Supply Corp.

    393 F.2d 462 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times

    No. 6961. April 12, 1968. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1968. Charles N. Steele, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Murray S. Freeman, Boston, Mass., with whom John J. Delaney, Jr., Boston, Mass., Henry G. Stewart, Cambridge, Mass., and Nutter, McClennen Fish, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH

  7. Playskool, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    477 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 72-1186, 72-1195. Argued January 22, 1973. Decided March 16, 1973. Rehearing Denied in No. 72-1186 April 23, 1973. As amended April 25, 1973. Francis Heisler, Mark L. Schwartzman, Robert C. Claus, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAIRCHILD and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Berlind Corp.

    494 F.2d 1200 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 4 times
    In Hudson Berlind Corp., supra, we made clear that in determining the existence of a question of representation the Board could examine factors other than the numerical strength of the contending unions.
  9. Int'l United A., A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In UAW, Pierce Governor Company operated a production facility in Anderson, Indiana, where the employees were represented by Local 940; for several decades, the “contracts had been made between the Company ‘and the International and its Local 940, jointly (herein called “the Union”), as the “exclusive bargaining agency” for the employees....’ ” Id. at 761 (emphasis added).