§

American Armored Car, LTD

339 N.L.R.B. 600 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
American Armored Car, LTD

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Zapex Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    621 F.2d 328 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times
    In Zapex Corp. v. NLRB, 621 F.2d 328, 334 (9th Cir.1980), the Board challenged the administrative law judge's (ALJ) "fail[ure] to draw an adverse inference from (the companies') failure to produce subpoenaed records[.

  4. Section 2001 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 2001   Cited 131 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining employer under the EPPA

  5. Section 2006 - Exemptions

    29 U.S.C. § 2006   Cited 54 times

    (a) No application to governmental employers This chapter shall not apply with respect to the United States Government, any State or local government, or any political subdivision of a State or local government. (b) National defense and security exemption (1) National defense Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the administration, by the Federal Government, in the performance of any counterintelligence function, of any lie detector test to- (A) any expert or consultant under contract

  6. Section 2007 - Restrictions on use of exemptions

    29 U.S.C. § 2007   Cited 18 times

    (a) Test as basis for adverse employment action (1) Under ongoing investigations exemption Except as provided in paragraph (2), the exemption under subsection (d) of section 2006 of this title shall not apply if an employee is discharged, disciplined, denied employment or promotion, or otherwise discriminated against in any manner on the basis of the analysis of a polygraph test chart or the refusal to take a polygraph test, without additional supporting evidence. The evidence required by such subsection