§

Amcast Automotive of Indiana Inc.

25-CA-029199 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 16, 2005)
Amcast Automotive of Indiana Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  5. Kamtech, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 01-1391, 01-1558. Submitted: August 7, 2002. Decided and Filed: September 4, 2002. This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on September 4, 2002. On December 3, 2002, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Daughtrey, Circuit Judge. J. Roy Weathersby, Eric K. Smith (briefed), Littler Mendelson, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner Cross-Respondent. Ailen A. Armstrong, Dep.Asso.Gen.Counsel, National

  6. Uniroyal Technology Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    151 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2 times
    Noting that union activist's “glowing performance reviews” and willingness to fill in on overtime shifts factored into the analysis of whether union activity was a motivating factor in discharge

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Parr Lance Ambulance Service

    723 F.2d 575 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 9 times

    No. 82-2724. Argued September 19, 1983. Decided December 14, 1983. Pat Wynns, Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Michael V. Gooch, Harrison Moberly, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Review of an order from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAUER and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge. HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Parr Lance Ambulance Service ("Parr Lance") asks this court to deny enforcement of an order issued by the National Labor

  8. Brown Root, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    634 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times

    No. 79-3491. January 19, 1981. Powell, Brown Maverick, William L. Bedman, William A. Brown, Harry M. Thomson, Jr., Houston, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Diana Orantes Ceresi, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition to Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, RUBIN and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board found