Amcar Division

16 Cited authorities

Buffalo Forge Co. v. Steelworkers
428 U.S. 397 (1976) Cited 253 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that district court was not empowered to grant preliminary injunctive relief pending arbitration decision
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong
393 U.S. 357 (1969) Cited 116 times
Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.
385 U.S. 421 (1967) Cited 117 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal Analyses
Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.
345 U.S. 71 (1953) Cited 128 times
Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
Kellogg Company v. N.L.R.B
457 F.2d 519 (6th Cir. 1972) Cited 33 times
In Kellogg Co. v. NLRB, 457 F.2d 519, 525 (6th Cir. 1972), we stated that the employees' right to honor another's picketline may only be waived through "clear and unmistakable language."
N.L.R.B. v. C.K. Smith Co., Inc.
569 F.2d 162 (1st Cir. 1977) Cited 25 times
Noting that "the sale of essentially similar products via similar distribution methods is also probative of integration"
Gary Hobart Water Corporation v. N.L.R.B
511 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 26 times
In Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.

Amcar Division

16 Cited authorities

Holding that district court was not empowered to grant preliminary injunctive relief pending arbitration decision

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In Kellogg Co. v. NLRB, 457 F.2d 519, 525 (6th Cir. 1972), we stated that the employees' right to honor another's picketline may only be waived through "clear and unmistakable language."

Noting that "the sale of essentially similar products via similar distribution methods is also probative of integration"

In Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.