Ambulance Services of New Bedford, Inc.
6 Cited authorities
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B
315 U.S. 100 (1942) Cited 187 timesRuling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order
N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.
321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 28 timesContaining similar language
National Labor Rel. Board v. Hopwood Retinning
104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939) Cited 41 timesIn NLRB v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939), the employer had locked out and discharged employees because of their union activity.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hopwood R. Co.
98 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 32 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 98 F.2d 97, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit based its conclusion that a company engaged in repairing milk and ice cream containers was engaged in "interstate commerce" within the meaning of the Act upon the fact that 23% of the containers on which work was to be done were transported in the company's truck from and to states other than the state where the work was performed.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 timesNo. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys