§

AM Property Holding Corp.

350 N.L.R.B. 998 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
AM Property Holding Corp.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 371 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 367 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Clinton's Ditch Co-op. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 142 times
    Finding the fact that a company complains to a contractor about problems that the company's customers had with the contractor's drivers, and that the company "expected appropriate action to be taken" against the contractor's driver did not demonstrate joint employment

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 50 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  7. Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

  8. Waterbury Hotel Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    314 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that it was proper to infer from supervisor statements that "hiring decisions were motivated by anti-union animus"

  9. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection

  10. Computer Associates Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    282 F.3d 849 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    No. 00-1544. Argued January 17, 2002. Decided March 15, 2002. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. David Bennet Ross argued the cause for the petitioner. Lori M. Meyers and Ronald A. Lindsay were on brief. Jill A. Griffin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General