§

Alpha Associates

344 N.L.R.B. 782 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Alpha Associates

8 Cited authorities

  1. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  2. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  3. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  4. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.

    219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support

  6. Royal Coach Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    838 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 114, 316, Dockets 87-4036, 87-4056. Argued September 30, 1987. Decided January 27, 1988. Joseph S. Rosenthal, New York City (Bondy Schloss, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Michael David Fox, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent. Petition

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Cardox Div. of Chemetron Corp.

    699 F.2d 148 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 8 times
    In Cardox, because the company voluntarily bargained with the unit, the Board did not make a determination of an appropriate bargaining unit.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Morse Shoe, Inc.

    591 F.2d 542 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 77-3313. February 22, 1979. William R. Stewart (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Madeline Balk (argued), Seligman Seligman, New York City, for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board ("Board")