4 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 timesUpholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
N.L.R.B. v. Rubin
424 F.2d 748 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 13 timesNo. 451, Docket 33820. Argued March 31, 1970. Decided April 17, 1970. Julius Rosenbaum, Washington, D.C., Attorney (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Atty., on the brief), for petitioner. Leon M. Labes, New York City (Auerbach Labes, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS, District Judge. Chief Judge of the District of Connecticut
N.L.R.B. v. Erikson
273 F.2d 477 (6th Cir. 1960) Cited 1 timesNo. 13819. January 12, 1960. Richard Scupi, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Melvin Pollack and James A. Flynn, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for petitioner. Dee Edwards, Detroit, Mich., for respondents. Before SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and MARTIN and CECIL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this Court for enforcement of its Order against the respondents. The hearing of the complaint filed before the Board