Allied Metal Hose Co., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Manufacturing Co.

    414 U.S. 270 (1973)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that although an employee may not be "legally bound to vote for the union and has not promised to do so in any formal sense" some "would feel obliged " to cast a union vote after having signed a union recognition slip
  2. Cross Baking Co., v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 1346 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 25 times
    In Cross Baking, however, the statement also contained a substantial misstatement of the actual value of the benefits to be received.
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Commercial Letter, Inc.

    496 F.2d 35 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 21 times

    No. 73-1247. Submitted March 11, 1974. Decided April 22, 1974. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jerome Kalishman, Clayton, Mo., for respondent. Bruce S. Feldacker, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VOGEL, Senior Circuit Judge, LAY and ROSS, Circuit Judges. ROSS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before us upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for enforcement of a bargaining order issued

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Urban Telephone Corporation

    499 F.2d 239 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that actions of a single employee were fairly attributable to the union under agency principles even though he was not formally designated as an agent
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Staub Cleaners, Inc.

    418 F.2d 1086 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 21 times
    Relying on the "stark words of Katz" to enforce a bargaining order where five years had elapsed between an election and a bargaining order
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Blades Manufacturing Corporation

    344 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times
    In Blades the court nullified a second election (choosing the union) within a year of a valid election rejecting the union.
  7. International U., E., R. M. W. v. N.L.R.B

    418 F.2d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that when examining extrinsic evidence to discern parties' intent, the Board must examine evidence from both sides
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

    470 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times
    Refusing to presume that the unlawful activity had an impact on or interference with the employees' freedom of choice where the record showed that the effect of the conduct was limited to specific employees, each of whom testified that he had voted his conscience and had ignored the unlawful conduct
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Rendering Company

    386 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 55, 56, Dockets 31183, 31184. Argued September 29, 1967. Decided December 11, 1967. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. William F. Joy, of Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist