Allied Barton Security Service, LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

    525 U.S. 813 (1998)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 97-1846. October 5, 1998. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 130 F. 3d 1101.

  4. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Atlanta Printing Specialties

    523 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times
    Enforcing NLRB order to employer and union to honor dues-checkoff cancellations tendered during annual escape period of fifteen days
  6. Peninsula Shipbuilders' Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    663 F.2d 488 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 81-1012, 81-1179 and 81-1412. Argued July 15, 1981. Decided September 21, 1981. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Eric Moskowitz, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Asst. Gen. Counsel for Special Litigation, W. Christian Schumann, Washington, D.C., on brief), for N.L.R.B. Deborah Crandall, Washington, D.C. (Andrew M. Kramer, Susan

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brotherhood of Railway Airline

    498 F.2d 1105 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 10 times
    Upholding prearbitration nondeferral by the Board under its Collyer doctrine
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Penn Cork Closures, Inc.

    376 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times
    In Penn Cork, employees rescinded the legal authorization for the union security clause through a Board election specifically provided for under section 9(e)(1) of the NLRA. Since it was reasonable to suppose that the employees had only authorized the checkoff because the payment of dues had been a condition of employment, the cancellation of the dues authorization after the vote seemed the only way to carry out Congress' evident intention in providing for such an election.