§

Allen Storage & Moving Co.

342 N.L.R.B. 501 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Allen Storage & Moving Co.

22 Cited authorities

  1. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. O'Neill v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    509 U.S. 904 (1993)   Cited 18 times
    Declining to apply the rule where "all the relevant facts were known. It was the meaning of the law that was misunderstood."

  6. Newspaper Pub. Assn. v. Labor Board

    345 U.S. 100 (1953)   Cited 31 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 53. Argued November 19, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. A labor organization does not engage in an unfair labor practice, within the meaning of § 8(b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, when it insists that newspaper publishers pay printers for reproducing advertising matter for which the publishers ordinarily have no use. Pp. 101-111. (a) The language and legislative

  7. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 41 times

    Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner

  8. Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. N.L.R.B

    924 F.2d 1078 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that brevity of parties' negotiations on issue and union's position that it still "had more movement to make" undermine employer's declaration of impasse

  9. Nursing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    164 F.3d 867 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that an employer could only distribute its proposal to union employees when the proposal was "properly before" the union

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Tomco Communications, Inc.

    567 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 37 times
    Taking into consideration, in determining substantiality of evidence, that the Board diverged from the ALJ's findings on matters of credibility