§

Alkahn Silk Label Co.

193 N.L.R.B. 167 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Alkahn Silk Label Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  3. Food Store Employees Union v. N.L.R.B

    422 F.2d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 19 times

    No. 21939. Argued January 10, 1969. Decided June 3, 1969. Mr. Charles Orlove, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., and Albert Gore, Chicago, Ill., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Elliott Moore, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel,

  4. United Steelworkers of America v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 846 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 20336, 20514. Argued March 16, 1967. Decided December 27, 1967. As Amended April 26, 1968. Certiorari Denied May 6, 1968. See 88 S.Ct. 1654. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliot Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,336 and intervenor in No. 20,514. Mr. Robert D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Bartholomew A. Diggins and Daniel