Alexandria Clinic, P.A.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,211 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. Johnson v. United States

    529 U.S. 694 (2000)   Cited 962 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "postrevocation penalties relate to the original offense"
  3. Public Citizen v. Department of Justice

    491 U.S. 440 (1989)   Cited 802 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff advocacy organizations' inability to obtain information that Congress made subject to disclosure under the Federal Advisory Committee Act "constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
  5. American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    499 U.S. 606 (1991)   Cited 167 times
    Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"
  6. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
  7. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
  8. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"
  9. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 474 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    814 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that court need not sustain agency interpretation that was based, not on agency's judgment, but on its erroneous interpretation of statute
  10. Epilepsy Foundation of N.E. Ohio v. N.L.R.B

    268 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 00-1332. Argued October 2, 2001. Decided November 2, 2001. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Anita Barondes argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Peter Chatilovicz, Ronald A. Lindsay, and Steven M. Moss. Maurice Baskin, Stephen A. Bokat, Robin S. Conrad, Heather L. MacDougall, Daniel V. Yager, Harold P. Coxson Jr., Burton J. Fishman, Robert J. Verdisco, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel were on

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355