369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Holding that jurisdiction under ERISA was proper because at issue was whether the employer was obligated to contribute during the term of a collective bargaining agreement to which it was not a party.
Finding that a new corporation formed by the split of an employer's moving and storage business into two entities was the alter ego of the employer and, therefore, bound by its collective bargaining obligations
Describing the labor law alter ego doctrine, whereby an employer will be treated interchangeably with its predecessor for purposes of applying labor laws, typically when the new employer is “created by the owners of the first for the purpose of evading labor law responsibilities”