Alexander Hage-Boutros v. Ethika, Inc.
5 Cited authorities
Vitaline Corp. v. General Mills, Inc.
891 F.2d 273 (Fed. Cir. 1989) Cited 9 timesNo. 89-1397. December 7, 1989. James H. Laughlin, Jr., Benoit, Smith Laughlin, Arlington, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief was John C. Smith, Jr. Jeffery A. Handelman, William Brinks Olds Hofer Gilson Lione, Chicago, Ill., argued, for appellee. With him on the brief was Dean A. Olds. Also on the brief was Richard M. Berman, Sr. Associate Counsel, General Mills, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel. Appeal from the United States Patent Trademark Office, Trademark Trial Appeal Board. Before
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 91,447 times 91 Legal AnalysesFinding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 Cited 39,165 times 322 Legal AnalysesRequiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials
Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 Cited 9,319 times 24 Legal AnalysesGranting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,585 times 272 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"