§

Alex R. Thomas & Co.

333 N.L.R.B. 153 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Alex R. Thomas & Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  2. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  3. Ewing v. N.L.R.B

    861 F.2d 353 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 23 times
    Approving the Meyers II rule

  4. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  5. Local 18, Bricklayers, I.U. v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 1309 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17322. Argued January 9, 1969. Decided March 4, 1969. Rehearing Denied May 14, 1969. John A. Craner, Craner Brennan, Elizabeth, N.J., for petitioner. Allison W. Brown, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, FORMAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. This is a petition