§

Alcoa Construction Systems, Inc.

212 N.L.R.B. 452 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Alcoa Construction Systems, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 760 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  3. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)

  6. N.L.R.B. v. L. 182, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    401 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 73, 74, Dockets 32267, 32268. Argued September 19, 1968. Decided October 3, 1968. Certiorari Denied March 10, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 1010. John E. Nevins, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., on the brief, for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: The National