ยง

Albuquerque Phoenix Express

153 N.L.R.B. 430 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Albuquerque Phoenix Express

4 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Galloway Manufacturing Corp.

    312 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 4 times

    No. 19787. January 23, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Broad, Atty., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. L. Robert Frank, Allen, Dell, Frank Trinkle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petition for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board is Granted. The respondents having conceded

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Benevento

    316 F.2d 224 (1st Cir. 1963)

    No. 5849. Submitted March 29, 1963. Decided April 15, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Margaret M. Farmer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Chief Judge. On December 29, 1961, we remanded this case to the Board for further proceedings because we felt that there was not sufficient evidence