All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
Albert Beard, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
01a03926 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 22, 2000)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
0
Citing Briefs
Briefs
0
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
0
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
3
Albert Beard, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
3
Cited authorities
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden
503 U.S. 318 (1992)
Cited 1,478 times
44 Legal Analyses
Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning
Spirides v. Reinhardt
613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
Cited 271 times
Holding "no one factor is determinative" of whether individual is employee or independent contractor for purposes of Title VII
Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals
29 C.F.R. § 1614.405
Cited 81 times
3 Legal Analyses
Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"